Why Ditching ‘Sustainability’ Is Not the Answer: A Counter Perspective
Hey there, dear reader! You may be here from last post where I explained Sustainability or you may have just taken a deep dive into the Honest Sorcerer’s article on sustainability.
Nice Article B. But…
A thought-provoking piece, right? And while B raises some valid concerns, it’s essential to have a well-rounded perspective. Let’s embark on a quick journey to explore the nuances of sustainability together, and yes, it’s going to be as engaging as that last cup of coffee you had.
Stick around! Together, we’ll explore point-for-point why sustainability is the key to making our world a better place. Because, hey, it’s the only one we’ve got!
P.S — This ended up being uncharacteristically longer than usual. (I will upload this as a podcast and link here, check back later)
Ready? Let’s roll.
The Human-Nature Connection:
Article author B kicks off with a poetic reflection on our ancestral ties to nature. It’s true! The article makes a compelling case about how we’re still deeply connected to nature. We eat plants and animals, drink water from rivers, and breathe air purified by trees. Once upon a time, we were hunter-gatherers, living in the wild. These days, we’re more likely to hunt for deals on Amazon than forage for berries.
But, wait a minute! Are we truly detached from nature? Not necessarily. Think about it: ever enjoyed a cozy night indoors while it rained cats and dogs outside? That’s technology (and civilization) offering you comfort.
Let’s explore further.
The article argues that humans have never truly been separate from nature, painting a picture of us as hunter-gatherers who once lived in harmony with the Earth. Fair point! But here’s the rub: we’ve also been toolmakers and farmers for thousands of years. That’s part of our “nature,” too. Our challenge now is to find a way to align our innovative side with our natural one. We’re not “above” nature, but we’re not merely passive members of it either.
We’ve danced with the winds, bathed in the rivers, and played hide and seek with trees. Okay, maybe not that last one. But you get the point! Yes, we’ve progressed with our snazzy gadgets and sprawling cities, but at our core, we’re still very much part of this world. We just reshaped our relationship with nature.
Technology and Sustainability: Frenemies?
The article argues that all technology — from mining to electricity — is unsustainable. But here’s a twist: technology also gives us the means to be more sustainable than ever.
Let’s use solar power as an example. Think wind and solar power. They’re not perfect, but they’re a far cry from burning fossil fuels, don’t you think? Sure, solar panels are made from materials that are mined, but once up and running, they produce energy without emitting greenhouse gases. In 2022, solar and wind power reduced CO2 emissions by an estimated 0.465 gigatons. That’s like taking 217.5 million cars off the road for a year!
Technology has empowered us, no doubt. It has also resulted in over-extraction and resource depletion. But remember, technology isn’t inherently evil. It’s how we use it. Think about it: we’ve used technology to heal diseases, connect globally, and even recycle waste. It’s all about balance.
True, mining isn’t the greenest of activities, but let’s not throw the baby out with the bathwater. Think about it: We also have technologies that help reduce our carbon footprint. Electric cars, renewable energy — heck, even your smartphone is a lot more energy-efficient than older models of phones and computers. So, while technology can be part of the problem, it can also be part of the solution.
While it’s true that some of our actions are harmful (bye-bye, plastic bags), there’s a world of innovative solutions out there that aim to harmonize with nature. Ever heard of green buildings? They’re not just buildings painted green. Kidding! Well, sort of.
The Resource Quandary
Ah, the doom and gloom of resource depletion. Our friend from the article argues that technology and civilization are inherently unsustainable because they rely on extracting finite resources from the Earth. While it’s true that mining and resource extraction have detrimental environmental impacts, this perspective lacks nuance.
You see, human ingenuity shouldn’t be underestimated. Advancements in technology can make resource extraction less harmful and more efficient. For example, “green mining” techniques are being developed to reduce the environmental impact of mineral extraction.
The article suggests that all our activities, from mining to agriculture, are unsustainable. But what about advancements in sustainable practices? Take regenerative agriculture, for instance. It aims to replenish the soil and conserve water, leading to a more sustainable food system. We’re not saying it’s perfect, but it’s a step in the right direction, right?
The article suggests that our sense of abundance is an illusion, and that our extraction rates will eventually slow down, revealing the harsh reality. While it’s true that we’re facing challenges — like climate change — that could force us to confront our habits, there’s also significant work being done to find sustainable alternatives. Global investments in clean energy totaled $1.3 trillion in 2022, expected to increase by almost a whopping 65% to $2.8 trillion in 2023.
Recycling and The Circular Economy: A Myth?
Ah, recycling. The age-old debate of whether it’s actually doing any good. The article calls them “pseudonyms for an inherently imperfect and wasteful process.” It’s like the “gluten-free” label of the sustainability world — everybody loves it, but not everyone knows what it means (I will touch on this in future posts, pinky promise).
Now, B makes a valid point that the “circular economy” and recycling aren’t perfect. True, they aren’t. But hey, neither am I, and neither are those adorable cat videos we all secretly love.
The idea behind a circular economy is to minimize waste and make the most of our resources. Think of it as giving your old jeans a new lease on life as a trendy tote bag. It’s not about being perfect; it’s about being better.
Perfect recycling might be a pipe dream. Like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. But, let’s not be hasty and label the whole concept of recycling as “unsustainable.” While it’s true that no recycling process is 100% perfect (because, let’s be real, what is?), it still offers a way to reuse and repurpose materials. It’s not perfect. But then again, what is? The aim is to improve, not achieve perfection. So, while it’s not the ultimate solution, it’s a step in the right direction. Every soda can or newspaper we recycle is one less in a landfill. Small steps, big results, right?
The original article claims that the circular economy is a myth because no process can be 100% efficient. True, we can’t reach 100% — thermodynamics won’t let us. But we can aim for 90%, 95%, or even 99%.
The argument that recycling and the circular economy are unsustainable because nothing can be 100% recycled is like saying, “Why brush your teeth if they’re going to fall out when you’re old?” Some recycling is better than no recycling, and advancements are being made to make the process more efficient.
Even if we achieve 90% efficiency in recycling, isn’t that still better than 0%? Think of it as getting a B+ in an exam. Sure, it’s not an A, but it’s way better than an F! Think of it as putting a band-aid on a scratch — it may not heal it entirely, but it sure helps!
Well, here’s a reality check: perfection is not the goal. Improvement is. According to the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, a circular economy could reduce waste by about 48% by 2030. Sure, it’s not 100%, but it’s far from insignificant!
The Renewable Energy Paradox
Ah, the million-dollar question! The article claims there’s nothing renewable about renewable energy because it still relies on finite resources.
Hence, B concludes that Renewable energy isn’t entirely renewable. Well, yes and no. The materials might be finite, but the energy source (like the sun or wind) isn’t. The sun and wind are infinite, but the devices capturing them aren’t. However, pitting renewables against fossil fuels isn’t entirely fair. It’s like comparing apples to, well, coal.
Renewables have a lower environmental footprint, and with innovation, their impact can be further reduced.
Renewables have a lower environmental footprint, and with innovation, their impact can be further reduced. True, solar panels aren’t made from fairy dust and unicorn tears. But they do offer a path away from fossil fuels. It’s not a perfect solution, but it’s a step in the right direction. Take solar panels: their efficiency has increased, and their cost has dropped by 89% since 2010, according to the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). Plus, scientists are researching ways to make them from more abundant and less harmful materials.
While B makes a compelling argument about the non-renewable components in “renewable energy.” Here’s a brain teaser for you: What might the solution be? The answer isn’t to discard renewable energy but to innovate further. Like turning lemons into lemonade, or better yet, lemon pie.
Let’s use an analogy. Imagine using a metal spoon to eat ice cream. The spoon isn’t edible (non-renewable in a way), but the ice cream is. And the spoon helps you enjoy many scoops over its lifetime. Similarly, while the devices might not be renewable, they help harness energy that is. It’s a matter of perspective!
But here’s the kicker: renewable energy systems like solar and wind have a net positive environmental impact over their lifetimes. According to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, the energy payback time for solar panels is now as low as one year, while their lifespan is about 25–30 years. That’s a good deal in my book!
Solar Energy still a massive improvement from burning fossil fuels! It’s like choosing a salad over a cheeseburger — not perfect, but better for you. To sprinkle some facts, according to the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), the renewable energy sector could provide 42 million jobs by 2050, up from 11 million in 2019. So not only is it renewable, but it’s also sustainable for the economy!
Entropy and Nature
B’s assertion that we can’t trick entropy is spot-on. It’s like trying to convince your grandma that her vintage radio is better than your latest smartphone. Some things just won’t budge. However, while we can’t reverse all the damage done to nature, we can certainly mitigate it. Think of it as apologizing after a disagreement. It might not erase the argument, but it can mend the relationship.
Remember, it’s not about tricking entropy; it’s about working with it. After all, as the saying goes, “we do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors; we borrow it from our children.”
What About De-Growth?
The article posits that we should go back to basics — small-scale farming, low-tech living, etc.
It’s a romantic idea, but let’s be pragmatic. Modern amenities have also given us medical advancements, global connectivity, and, yes, Netflix. A middle ground exists where we can enjoy the benefits of modern life while still making sustainable choices.
The idea of scaling back our energy use and living simpler lives isn’t as far-fetched as it sounds. We don’t necessarily need to return to the Stone Age, but a little minimalism never hurt anyone. The article suggests that this is unlikely because it would be an “attack on our personal freedom.” But freedom also includes the choice to live more sustainably, doesn’t it?
B’s vision of a future where we return to a simpler, nature-centric existence is poetic. But, who’s to say we can’t have the best of both worlds? Picture this: cities with lush green rooftops, roads that absorb water, and communities that grow their food. Sounds dreamy, right? It’s possible with a blend of technology and a sprinkle of sustainability.
The article paints a picture of our descendants living in an ecotechnic future, sifting through the ruins of our civilization. It’s a vivid, almost cinematic image. But history has shown that predictions about the future are tricky. Remember when people in the 1900s thought we’d have flying cars by 2000? We might not be zooming around in the skies, but we do have some mind-boggling tech advancements. So, who’s to say what the future holds?
The Future: Doom and Gloom or Room for Hope?
So, is the word ‘sustainability’ just a feel-good term, or is there something more to it? I’d argue that while we have significant challenges ahead, we’re also armed with the creativity and ingenuity to tackle them. As the original article rightly said, “humanity is a bigger and more versatile concept than the current mode we’ve stumbled onto.” But let’s not forget: stumbling is also how we learn to walk.
Is civilization as we know it going to crumble in the face of resource depletion and climate change? Maybe, if we continue down an unsustainable path. But we have choices. Technologies are improving, social attitudes are changing, and global initiatives are being taken to combat climate change and promote sustainability. You can bet your last Bitcoin that humanity is more versatile than the article gives us credit for.
Sure, let’s not be blind optimists. We have a lot of work to do to transition to a truly sustainable society. But dismissing the entire concept of sustainability and technological advancements as mere illusions isn’t just pessimistic — it’s paralyzing. It’s crucial to approach this with both eyes open, acknowledging the limitations while striving for improvement.
Planning for the Future
The article suggests we’re doomed to return to a primitive way of life. But guess what? There are alternative visions for the future that are neither utopian nor apocalyptic. We’re talking smart cities, electric cars, vertical farming — you name it. The key is to transition wisely, and that’s where the concept of sustainability comes in handy.
The original article also argues that any effort to change our ways is essentially futile. However, history has shown that humans are incredibly adaptable. Programs like the Green New Deal aim to transition to a sustainable economy, offering a roadmap for the future.
It’s essential to remember that simplicity doesn’t necessarily mean going backward. We can integrate the best of both worlds, merging technological advances with sustainable practices.
But What If…?
Now, some of you might still be thinking, “All these advancements are nice, but they’re still not 100% sustainable.” True, but aiming for 100% can be the enemy of the good. Sustainability is a journey, not a destination. And it’s better to be on the right path than stuck at the starting line, paralyzed by pessimism.
Sure, we can’t be blind optimists. There are pitfalls and challenges, such as greenwashing, where companies pretend to be more sustainable than they are. It’s essential to be critical and vigilant.
Summary: The “S” Word Isn’t Going Anywhere
Whew! That was a roller coaster. Sustainability isn’t just a fancy word. It’s an ethos, a vision of the future where we live in harmony with nature. B’s perspective is thought-provoking, reminding us of the urgency. But remember, dear reader, we’re not just passive spectators. We’re the protagonists of this story. Let’s pen a future we’d be proud of.
So, what’s the deal with sustainability? Well, it’s a complex issue, no doubt. But painting it as an unattainable dream neglects human ingenuity, adaptability, and the very real progress being made in technology and policy.
In the grand scheme of things, sustainability isn’t just a buzzword to be tossed around lightly. It’s a multifaceted concept that helps us navigate the complex challenges we face. Sure, it’s not the magical answer to all our problems, but it’s a framework that encourages us to think critically and act responsibly.
Sustainability isn’t just a buzzword. It’s a call to action, a mindset, and a vision for a better future. It’s about balance, innovation, and a touch of optimism. As we navigate this journey, let’s remember: It’s not about going back in time, but about forging a harmonious path forward.
To sum it all up, while we have our challenges ahead, it’s essential to approach them with an open mind and a sprinkle of optimism. It’s all about balance. Remember, we might not be perfect, but we’re pretty darn resilient. And as we continue this journey, we’ll learn, adapt, and hopefully, make this world a better place for generations to come.
Oh, and before I sign off, always remember: sustainability isn’t just a buzzword; it’s a mindset. Let’s embrace it, flaws and all, and see where it takes us.
At the end of the day, B’s article serves as a thought-provoking reminder of our responsibilities. While we might not revert to hunting and gathering (unless it’s hunting for deals online and gathering likes on social media!), we can definitely strive for a balance. Remember, it’s not about “us vs. nature” but “us *with* nature.” And on that note, let’s keep the conversation going. After all, discussions lead to solutions, and solutions pave the way for a brighter future.
Until next time, dear readers, keep questioning, keep innovating, and remember what the great thinker, Wes Jackson, once hinted at: Humans might be out of context now, but we have the potential to rewrite our story.
What Next?:
Feeling curious? Stick around; we’ll be diving into more topics. In the meantime, remember: we may not be 100% sustainable yet, but we’re learning, adapting, and most importantly — trying. Together, let’s decode the future!
Stay tuned, because there's a lot more to unpack!
And remember, as someone smarter than me once said, "The best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago. The second best time is now." So let's get planting, metaphorically or otherwise!
Until next time,
**P.S.**: Think of us humans as ‘a species in evolution’. Every challenge we face is an opportunity to grow, adapt, and become better. After all, isn’t that what life’s all about? 😉
Connect with Me
Let’s be friends! You can find me on Twitter, Threads, Substack, Medium, and LinkedIn.
